Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Commercial Developments in Phoenix When the City was Flying High - The Boom and Bust of Commercial Real Estate in Phoenix


Read this article to get a good overview of the Boom and Bust Cycle of Commercial Real Estate in Phoenix. It highlights some of the commercial developments between 2000-2008.


Saturday, March 27, 2010

Commercial real estate market winds up decade of extremesPhoenix Business Journal - by Jan Buchholz

In 1989, Barron’s, a national financial magazine, predicted the end of a boom era in Phoenix, with the collapse of both the commercial and residential real estate markets.

The article cited office vacancies soaring beyond 20 percent and foreclosures accounting for 42 percent of all residential sales. It noted that the bubble of speculative land brokerage was about to burst, and that financial institutions were in distress. It also discussed a decline in population growth and a stagnating economic base far too dependent on construction and housing.

“For all its pretension to major city status, Phoenix remains a locale arrested in development between brash adolescence and adulthood. The city can be both charming and exasperating,” the article read. “But the one constant that binds virtually everyone in the area is a unshakable faith in the future expansion of Phoenix. Yet that growth is, by no means, assured.”

Worse than deja vu
Years pass, but some things stay the same. Today, office vacancies in the Valley are again over 20 percent. Industrial vacancies are at 17 percent, and the retail market is struggling after an overabundance of shopping properties were delivered in 2007 and 2008.

Foreclosures on Phoenix homes still generate dismal headlines, and many touted commercial developments are either on hold or scrapped.

Real estate pundits continue to decry the area’s ongoing reliance on population growth and real estate to fuel its economic engine, and they’re calling for change.

Phoenix has muddled through the past 20 years fairly spectacularly. Still, local economists, real estate brokers and economic developers warn that radical change is warranted during this severe recession.

“Historically, the state and especially the greater Phoenix area have outperformed the nation in both expansion and recession periods,” said John Lenio, economist for CB Richard Ellis’ economic incentives group in Phoenix. “This time is different. Arizona ranks last among all states for job retention at the present time. Unfortunately, this may be the new norm without some serious efforts to diversity our economic base.”

At a crossroads
Chris Mackay, economic development director for the city of Chandler, agrees that this cycle is different.

“We can’t live on construction. We can’t live on population growth. We’re at a crossroads and facing competition from other states,” he said.

Despite the contention that Phoenix needs a new economic steering mechanism, Craig Henig, senior managing director of CBRE in Phoenix, has watched troubled real estate times transform into the best of times. He remembers the last major downturn during the savings and loan crisis around 1990, which hit Arizona particularly hard. And he remembers the Barron’s article well.

“It poured a lot of gas onto the fire, but it also created a lot of opportunity. Buildings were bought well below replacement costs, and people migrated here like crazy,” Henig said.

In fact, Barron’s pessimistic prognostication did not come to pass. For sure, the economy was sluggish for several years, but Phoenix forged ahead.

During the 1990s, new communities were delivered in every direction. Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport was expanded and remodeled. Two major sports facilities were completed: Chase Field and U.S. Airways Center.

New highways were built, including State Route 51 and Loop 101, which was completed in 2002. Loop 202, which encircles the east Valley, was built between 2005 and 2009. Both opened up new employment centers and resulted in numerous office and industrial projects being developed.

“The opening of the 101 opened up the Deer Valley corridor,” said Keith Lambeth, senior vice president of Colliers International in Phoenix. “Deer Valley was not a submarket, and overnight it became a vibrant scene.”

Thus, during the 1990s, telecom companies, insurance firms such as USAA and investment firms such as Charles Schwab opened and expanded operations here.

“Phoenix was embraced because we don’t have disasters here,” said Charles Miscio, another Colliers senior vice president.

Those kinds of companies don’t want to deal with hurricanes, earthquakes and other acts of God, he said. They prefer nice climates without surprises.

Downtown Phoenix transforms
With the suburbs opening up to more commercial development, business and political forces launched a concerted effort to create a vibrant downtown.

In 2000, the 23-story Collier Center was built by developer Opus West in partnership with Barron Collier Co. Bank of America became the anchor tenant.

In 2001, the 20-story Phelps Dodge tower, now called One Central Avenue, was built as headquarters for the mining giant that later merged with Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.

In 2003, the city of Phoenix began development of the Phoenix Bioscience Campus at Seventh and Van Buren streets. That campus now includes the Translational Genomics Research Institute, International Genomics Consortium, the University of Arizona College of Medicine–Phoenix in partnership with Arizona State University, the UA College of Pharmacy, Northern Arizona University’s allied health program and Phoenix Union Bioscience High School. The ASU College of Nursing opened in 2009.

ASU’s downtown campus also includes the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication, which opened in 2008.

Add to that the $600 million expansion of the Phoenix Convention Center and the 31-story Sheraton Phoenix Downtown Hotel, both completed in 2008, and a vibrant city is beginning to unfold.

The One Central Park East office building was completed in 2009 and will serve as the new headquarters for Freeport-

McMoRan. Several floors of that office tower, built by Mesirow Financial, are being converted into a boutique business hotel to be operated under the Westin brand.

This summer, the massive CityScape project will be delivered by Scottsdale-based RED Development. It includes an office tower and retail components that downtown has needed for years, including a drugstore and a specialty grocer. A Kimpton Hotel also will be built there.

West Valley rises
Also during the past decade, large-scale projects were delivered in Glendale. Jobing.com Arena, home of the Phoenix Coyotes hockey team, opened in December 2003. The University of Phoenix Stadium, home of the Arizona Cardinals, opened in August 2006. Neighboring those venues is Westgate City Center, which includes stores, restaurants and the Renaissance Phoenix-Glendale Hotel, which was finished just in time for the Super Bowl in January 2008.

Other significant hotel properties brought online throughout the Valley include the Westin Kierland Resort & Spa in northeast Phoenix, the JW Marriott Desert Ridge Resort & Spa in north Phoenix, the W Hotel in Scottsdale, the Wild Horse Pass Hotel & Casino in the Gila River Indian Community, and the InterContinental Montelucia Resort & Spa in Paradise Valley.

Retail options also grew significantly during the past 10 years.

Westcor, a subsidiary of Macerich Corp., continued its local retail dominance with the opening of Chandler Fashion Center in 2001 and SanTan Village in Gilbert in 2007. Another retail player also continued to make waves: Vestar Development Corp. perfected the power center concept, rolling out Tempe Marketplace in 2007 to bustling crowds.

A third local retail developer, De Rito Partners Development Inc., built Mesa Riverview in 2007 and paid $88 million for the aging Scottsdale Pavilions center on the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, east of Scottsdale.

Although De Rito bought at the height of the real estate market, the risk and the multimillion-dollar renovations may pay off. The Arizona Diamondbacks and Colorado Rockies, in partnership with the Salt River tribe, announced last summer that a new spring training facility would be built just north of the Pavilions.

A short distance east of there, the tribe’s Talking Stick Resort & Spa will open this year.

Lake makes waves
In Tempe, the landscape has changed dramatically in 10 years. In late 1999, Tempe Town Lake was formed by creating a dam in the Salt River wash and purchasing water from the Central Arizona Project. The picturesque setting impelled development — particularly on the south shore, near downtown Tempe.

SunCor led the way with the nautical-themed Hayden Ferry Lakeside, which includes two office towers and luxury condominiums. Tower II is one of the many Class A office structures in the Valley that captured a high price when it was sold at the height of the real estate market in 2008. Sumitomo Corp. paid $92.5 million.

Other office sales of prominence include the two towers at Renaissance Square in downtown Phoenix.

What might best showcase the run-up in value might be the 2006 and 2007 sales of Chase Tower. In 2006, it sold for

$103 million. The following year, it traded for $167 million.

But true to the Valley’s long-standing reputation for luxury lodging, the biggest sales of the decade were reserved for hotel properties. In 2006, the Westin Kierland Resort & Spa sold for $392 million. That same year, the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess sold for $345 million.

The fever pitch of prices and transactions was cooling dramatically by late 2008. Large-scale developments such as the partially completed CityNorth mixed-use project in north Phoenix and the Centerpoint residential high-rises in Tempe may not be completed for some time.

Industrial boom to bust
The industrial market, once sizzling, now is a shadow of its former self. The sales pitch that the West Valley could challenge Southern California as a distribution hub has been discarded, said Don MacWilliam, a senior vice president of Colliers International.

“There was the hype in 2006, 2007 and 2008 that Phoenix was becoming a first-tier distribution hub,” MacWilliam said. “Now we’re off everybody’s radar screen. We’ve gone back to regional status.”

In the months ahead, the concern is that large commercial real estate loans will go into default, sending the local economy into yet another dizzying roller-coaster ride.

“The highs and lows of the past four to five years certainly have been the most severe in my professional experience, and probably since the Depression era,” said Don Miner, a director of law firm Fennemore Craig PC and principal of the Arizona School of Real Estate & Business.

From limbo to life
Miner sees some stability returning to the market, and said responsible lending practices must be enforced. He’s also confident that developments sitting in limbo will spring back to life.

“Over time, the market and sustainable business opportunity will take care of the projects that were not completed in the last downturn,” he said.

Mackay said she’s more optimistic, too.

“The industry has exhaled. We’re seeing a significant uptick in activity,” she said. “Buyers are starting to pull the trigger instead of just kicking tires.”

Beth Jo Zeitzer, president of ROI Properties and an expert in distressed properties, said the recession is a window of opportunity for a few.

“This market is not for the faint of heart or risk-averse investor,” Zeitzer said. “Those with laser-sharp focus, a long-term vision and patient capital will flourish in the next phase of the market.”

Even so, Lenio offers words of advice that hark back to Barron’s 1989 assessment.

“Arizona no longer can rely on sunshine and golf course to attract new business,” he said.

“If we don’t get it this time, we’re never going to get it,” Mackay said.

This story was part of the Phoenix Business Journal's annual Commercial Real Estate magazine distributed with the March 26 print editio

Be careful of mortgage and real estate frauds!

Here is a list of some of the more common mortgage and real estate frauds happening down in the states! Be careful when you're doing business and always do your due diligence!!!

- Scrutinize valuation reports done by non-appraisers
- Be careful of loan modification schemes
- Don't be a victim of the "flopping" of short-sale properties:
a technique where someone gets two price opinions from brokers, giving the low one to the bank arranging a short sale of a home nearing foreclosure and the high one to a potential buyer.

Such techniques can net an unscrupulous buyer tens of thousands of dollars while shorting the bank and homeowner and taking advantage of the subsequent buyer.

- "One of the most common cases of real estate fraud I've seen are forgeries by spouses and family members," says Bert Rush, senior vice president of Santa Ana, Calif.-based First American Title Insurance Co. "A husband may use his girlfriend--who is posing as a wife and has intercepted the wife's credit cards as identification--to take over a piece of land."

To read more: http://www.forbes.com/2003/03/13/cx_bs_0314home.html

If Morgan Stanley is Going into Phoenix, What's Stopping You?


Below is a Press Release on Morgan Stanley Investments raising $370 million to go into Phoenix to buy properties. This, I believe, will be a very lucrative investment for everyone! Particularly if you don't have enough capital to buy the properties yourself in cash.


March 22, 2010, 8:03 a.m. EDT

Morgan Stanley Alternative Investment Partners Raises $370 Million for Phoenix Global Real Estate Secondaries Fund

NEW YORK, Mar 22, 2010 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Morgan Stanley Investment Management (MSIM) today announced that Morgan Stanley Alternative Investment Partners (AIP) raised $370 million in commitments for Morgan Stanley AIP Phoenix Global Real Estate Secondaries 2009 LP (Phoenix), a fund dedicated to acquiring secondary interests in opportunistic and value-added private equity real estate funds. The capital raised exceeded AIP's initial $250 million target.

"This successful fund-raising effort against a challenging market backdrop is a testament to the strength of our investment team and our differentiated investment strategy and process," said Jacques Chappuis, Head of AIP. "We believe that demand for comprehensive expertise in real estate investing combined with the team's fiduciary background, direct real estate transactional experience and unique access to a substantial flow of secondaries transactions contributed to the strong response we saw from institutional investors globally."

The objective of Phoenix is to target off-market secondary opportunities in private equity real estate funds that have a sustainable strategy for generating superior returns across real estate cycles, an emphasis on strong real estate fundamentals and in-depth knowledge of local markets.

"For the first time ever, investors in private equity real estate funds are selling significant interests in the secondary market, and as a result, we are finding tremendous opportunities to acquire high quality assets at attractive valuations," said Joseph D. Stecher, Head and Chief Investment Officer of AIP Real Estate Fund of Funds. "We are focusing on best-in-class small- to mid-size fund managers globally as we seek to capitalize on several distinct advantages of investing in the secondary market, including the ability to avoid start-up costs and fees, accelerate investment programs and shorten time for realization, and effectively value underlying asset portfolios."

AIP's Real Estate Fund of Funds team, based in New York and London, has a wide range of hands-on experience in private equity real estate investing, property acquisition, development and management, real estate equity and debt financing, workouts, and the real estate public equity markets.

AIP is the fund of funds division of Morgan Stanley Investment Management. AIP manages portfolios of hedge funds, private equity funds and real estate funds for some of the world's largest institutions and high net worth individuals. AIP has offices in West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania; New York; San Francisco; Atlanta; London and Hong Kong.

MSIM, together with its investment advisory affiliates, has nearly 1,000 investment professionals around the world and approximately $266 billion in assets under management or supervision as of December 31, 2009(1). By leveraging its global 'community of boutiques' structure and the strength of Morgan Stanley, MSIM strives to provide outstanding long-term investment performance, service and a comprehensive suite of investment management solutions to a diverse client base, which includes governments, institutions, corporations and individuals worldwide.

Morgan Stanley /quotes/comstock/13*!ms/quotes/nls/ms (MS 29.21, -0.22, -0.75%) is a leading global financial services firm providing a wide range of investment banking, securities, investment management and wealth management services. The Firm's employees serve clients worldwide including corporations, governments, institutions and individuals from more than 1,200 offices in 37 countries. For further information about Morgan Stanley, please visit www.morganstanley.com.

SOURCE: Morgan Stanley

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

7 Mistakes Buyers Make and How to Avoid Them


7 Mistakes Buyers Make and How to Avoid Them!

The rules of real estate have changed over the past five years. On the one hand, affordability is hovering at all-time high levels, interest rates remain low and there are a large number of homes to choose from. The bad news? Lending practices are tighter and creative financing is, well, a little less creative due to strict regulations. Still, buyer power for those looking to purchase a home is incredible, and there are some great opportunities in this market. If you’re looking to get into a home soon, be sure you know the mistakes buyers make and how to avoid them. Here are the top seven.

1) Holding onto your home. Before you begin the home search process, sell the one you’re in. Chances are its going to take longer than you expect to find a buyer because of stricter lending practices and current market conditions. The last thing you want is the added financial responsibility of carrying a second mortgage while you try to sell your home.

2) Not addressing your credit score. Stand around the real estate water cooler and you’ll hear one thing: Credit markets and lending practices are tighter than ever. This means you must have an excellent credit score to secure financing at a low interest rate. You’re allowed to pull your credit score at no cost to you. Request yours, and then take the necessary steps to fix any lingering issues that could affect your ability to secure financing.

3) Skipping the pre qualification and pre approval processes. One of the biggest mistakes buyers make is not knowing how much they can afford. By getting pre qualified AND pre approved you walk into the home search process knowing the exact amount of money you can spend. This narrows your search, lessening the time it takes to find a home that fits your individual needs. That also gives you more time to spend in the homes that could potentially be yours down the road. Pre approval also gives you big buying power during the negotiating process since sellers can’t reject your offer based on unavailable financing. The bottom line: Once you have your credit in check talk to your trusted lender to get pre qualified AND pre approved.

4) Not knowing when to stay and when to walk away. It’s worth repeating: buyers have more power than ever during the negotiating process. Consult with your realtor and view current comps. But don’t make the mistake of walking away because of a few thousand dollars. Think about it this way: a few thousand dollars could translate to less than $100 a month on your mortgage.

5) Not knowing the total costs involved. Some buyers, especially first-timers, aren't entirely aware of the costs associated with buying a home. These include: closing costs, title insurance and lawyer fees as well as ongoing costs such as property taxes, homeowners association dues, utilities and yard maintenance. When you first begin shopping for a home, always ask your real estate agent and mortgage representative to provide you with an average amount of additional closing costs so that you can work them into your budget.

6) Signing contracts with contingencies. This is a critical mistake that could end up costing you big bucks. Thoroughly review all the “ripple affects” of signing any contracts that allow the seller to stay in the home for an extended period of time. Why? Depending on how long they stay, you run the risk of losing your interest rate. Or worse, the deal falls through the cracks and you’re back at square one: more listings. Bottom line: have your real estate agent review the contract and explain any and all contingencies so that you understand what you’re getting into.

7) Not purchasing a home protection plan. You never know what problems will arise once you purchase the home. Not protecting is a mistake and extremely costly when the problems are big. Be sure to purchase a home protection plan. This is essentially a mini insurance policy that usually lasts one year from the date of sale. It typically covers basic repairs you may encounter and can be purchased for a nominal fee. Talk to friends and agents, and ask them to give you referrals to home insurance brokers. The agents of home insurance companies will help you find the protection plan you need.

Thursday, March 4, 2010

World's housing markets are mostly recovering, but the situation is patchy




The world’s housing markets are (mostly) recovering, according to the Global Property Guide’s latest survey of residential property time-series. During the last quarter of 2009, house prices rose in 22 countries, of the 34 countries for which quarterly house-price statistics are available, and fell in only 11 countries.

However, if we look at year-on-year figures, 2009 has not been a happy year. During 2009, 18 countries’ housing markets experienced price declines, while only 16 countries experienced house price increases.

In other words, though the last two quarters suggest that recovery is now taking place, in most countries house prices are down on the year.

The Global Property Guide’s statistical presentation uses price-changes after inflation, giving a more realistic picture than the (more upbeat) nominal figures usually preferred by real estate agents.



Source: Various series, data descriptions and sources here


Recovery uneven - downturn continues in much of the world


Even in the limited sense described above – a Q3 and/or Q4 recovery - the present recovery is uneven. Some countries in Asia are rapidly recovering. But housing markets in some of the world’s worst-hit countries have continued to decline.

Hard-hit Lithuania and Ireland’s housing markets fell sharply during 2009 (-29.29% in Lithuania, and -11.09% in Ireland), and during 2008 (-19.22% in Lithuania, and -11.89% in Ireland). The last quarter offered no respite to either country (-5.83 in Q4 in Ireland, and -4.87% in Q4 in Lithuania).

Ireland’s latest quarterly drop of -5.83% is the worst since the Irish time-series began. Back in the boom years, Ireland enjoyed steep house price appreciations, peaking at 26% during the year to Q1 1999. Now there is still no sign of respite. The economy shrank 7.4% y-o-y to Q3 2009. Irish unemployment increased to 11.6% in 2009, from 6.4% in 2008.

Bulgaria’s housing market was badly hit during 2009 (-26.36%), and its house-price decline continued during Q4 (-2.26% on the quarter).

Slovakia is another country which experienced a steep decline during the year 2009 (-12.70%), and whose housing markets were still heading down in Q4 (-2.09%).

Spain is a similar case, added to which Spanish statistics are widely believed to understate its house-price declines. By end-2009, Spanish houses were back to their 2004 values. House prices fell 6.42% during 2009 and 1.62% during the last quarter.

Portugal’s recovery in mid 2009 proved to be short-lived. House prices were up by a meagre 0.91% in 2009. But over the last quarter of the year, house prices were down by 1.06%. Portugal, like Italy and Germany, is something of a special case, because these countries entirely missed the housing boom that swept through the world.

In Kiev, Ukraine, house prices fell 30.22% during the year and 3.67% during Q4 2009. Kiev had enormous increases during the boom years, peaking at 75% y-o-y to Q3 2005. Figures for Ukraine are in nominal terms.

Russia’s housing market has been in crisis since Q4 2008. Over the year to Q3 2009 (the latest quarter for which data is available data), house prices in Russia dropped by 19.97%.

House prices in Greece (data is for cities outside Athens) declined by 1.39% y-o-y to Q3 2009 (the latest quarter for which data is available).



Source: Various series, data descriptions and sources here


Respite from the catastrophe


The biggest price-declines in the world during this crisis have taken place in Riga, Latvia (down 50.22% in 2009, after a fall of 36.98% in 2008), and in Dubai, UAE (down 43.29% in 2009, after a surge of 42.66% in 2008).

Both Latvia and UAE are now enjoying modest recoveries, with rises of 4.61% in Q4 in Riga and 0.88% in Dubai. Dubai’s figure is stated in nominal terms because inflation-adjusted quarterly figures are unavailable.



Slow recovery in America


In the United States, house prices fell by 0.31% (seasonally-adjusted and inflation-adjusted) in Q4, or by -2.61% over the year 2009, according to the FHFA’s purchase-only index, the most authoritative US index.

This downward movement was something of a surprise. However what really matters is that the annual house price depreciation was less during the year to this quarter, than in the year to each of the previous four quarters – i.e., the direction of change has been increasingly positive.

The seasonally-adjusted Case-Shiller index rose by a meagre 0.14% during the last quarter of 2009, and fell 3.87% during the entire year of 2009. But again, this was in the context of an overall improvement in momentum, as measured by y-o-y figure as taken each quarter, so that the Case-Shiller index also shows an improving situation in the US.

Canada experienced a house price decline of 2.23% during the year to end-2009. However, the house price index stopped falling in September 2009, so recovery is in progress.

Much of Latin America is experiencing a house price boom, but, with the partial exception of Colombia and Argentina, Latin American countries publish no house-price data.



Some booms in the Middle East


Israel’s house prices have been rising strongly ever since Q4 2008. During 2009, prices rose 15.52%, the highest increase in 10 years. Israel ranked third in this quarter’s survey.

Lebanon is also enjoying a house price boom, though it has not yet published figures for 2009.



Asia-Pacific continues to rally


Hong Kong and Taiwan have been Asia’s top two performers. Hong Kong’s house prices are back above pre-crisis levels. Hong Kong’s housing market experienced a quick turnaround when prices surged 20.81% during the entire year 2009, after suffering from a 15% decline in the first quarter of 2009. In Taiwan, house prices were up by 18.29% during 2009 and 4.70% during Q4. Investors’ confidence in the Taiwanese market has significantly improved, after a number of economic agreements were signed with China.

In Singapore, after a painful decline in 2008 (-9.59%), the year 2009 was a roller-coaster for the housing market. After price-falls in the first half of 2009, Singapore’s house prices surged 14.30% in Q3 2009, and 6.58% in Q4. During the entire year, house prices were up 2.12%.

The Singaporean government was quick to react against speculative buying by tightening credit rules, introducing a seller's stamp duty, and lowering the loan-to-value limit for housing loans.

Australia and New Zealand have sustained the increases they experienced during the middle of 2009. Australia’s house prices increased by 11.28% during 2009 (4.63% during Q4), while New Zealand’s increased by 4.86% (3.40% during Q4).

Recovery is coming slowly to Japan. The average price of existing condominium sales was up by a meagre 0.80% during the year to end 2009. The increase is only evident when prices are adjusted for inflation. However, there was an increase of 3.55% during Q4.

Thailand’s house prices slumped by 15.56% during 2009, but rose by 1.97% during the last quarter.